Home › Forums › Covid-19 Discussion, Experts Speak Out & Censorship › Dark Psychology – Forcing the Narrative › Big Pharma Promotors – Keeping the Virus Alive with Variants › Reply To: Big Pharma Promotors – Keeping the Virus Alive with Variants
PSI will block this site in totality. This is in the heart of disinformation.
A pharma supported website. Go read the titles of the articles and see how this push is happening with fake reporting.
Check the dashboard and see if we in a so called pandemic? Link here
The go read another article titled ‘How Delta is pushing the U.S. into a new phase of the Covid-19 pandemic ‘ found here.
Here a a few reader comments on this article: SHOCKING
As per Dr. Rook below, the mere suggestion that “experts say that the protection provided by Maxine’s appears more robust and durable than that from infection” is such outright gibberish, rubbish, lying, that I don’t know where to start. Where do you people get this stuff? What “experts”? I am happy to share a growing library of evidence that this is a serious misrepresentation. At best, this is irresponsible disinformation being spread by this Pharma-funded website.
Radbruch and Chang, A long-term perspective on immunity to COVID, Nature, 15 July 2021. Volume 595. Page 359
A dialog showing a permalink to the comment
A popover with more user information
Your citation does not support your claims nor are any of the claims in your other comment here w/ Rook supported.
the vaccine is now being shown to be very poor for preventing transmission – likely even less effective than masks that were not effective at all.
Completely unsubstantiated and histrionic to boot.
At best, this is irresponsible disinformation
Interesting statement. Worth re-examining this, then:
the vaccine is now being shown to be very poor for preventing transmission – likely even less effective than masks that were not effective at all.
Sure smells like irresponsible disinformation.
A dialog showing a permalink to the comment
A popover with more user information
(Edited)
Is your “growing library of evidence” from the same thoroughly and summarily debunked garbage sources of information that you cite on your alternative/natural medicine clinic’s website? From places like Mercola, where the snake oil flows freely to the consumers as their pocketbooks lighten?
“Interestingly, homeopathy might wind up being one of the better weapons here just as it was during the devastating 1918 flu pandemic. Non MDs practicing homeopathy reported a https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/12/06/homeopathic-remedies-for-influenza.aspx than conventional care at that time. Precious little has been researched, some evidence does exist for efficacy. Corona? Remains to be seen.” This came from your blog. Anyone wanting to do a deeper dive there will find some frighteningly irrational thoughts. It is apparent that you are anti-vax practically across the board after having read your blog entries.
Assertions coming from a physician who peddles in unfounded medical practices that have demonstrably worsened outcomes for patients (second link below, to cite but one example of peer-reviewed research in a relatively high impact factor publication) are not assertions I would run with.
Ad hominem? Sure. Appropriate? Of course!
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-pdf/110/1/121/23536631/djx145.pdf
