Doctors, Parents Sue HHS Over COVID-19 Vaccine EUA for Children

Home Forums All Things Covid All Things Legal Doctors, Parents Sue HHS Over COVID-19 Vaccine EUA for Children

last updated by PS 6 months, 3 weeks ago
1 voice
2 replies
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2620
    PS
    Keymaster

    A number of doctors and parents have sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its secretary, Xavier Becerra, in a federal court, seeking to prevent the expansion of the emergency use authorization (EUA) of COVID-19 vaccines from including children under 16 years old.

    America’s Frontline Doctors—a nonprofit organization—and parents filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on May 19, saying “every plaintiff with children or patients in the target age group stands to be immediately and irreparably harmed by the extension.”

    The motion is against HHS and its relevant subagencies and personnel, including but not limited to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Becerra, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the HHS Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.

    “We’ve never seen this level of side effects for any vaccine without the FDA taking action,” Dr. Angelina Farella, pediatric medical director for America’s Frontline Doctors, said in a statement. “The Rotavirus vaccine was pulled for 15 cases of non-lethal side effects and the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled for 25 deaths. But now, by the CDC’s own data, we are seeing a 12,000 percent increase in deaths with these vaccines and they’re still talking about giving this to our kids.”

    Full story here

    TRO – Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Against Use of COVID Vaccine in Children

    PDF download here

    #2621
    PS
    Keymaster

    PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

    I. SUMMARY
    Plaintiffs bring before the Court today a request for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) against the U.S. Department of Health and
    Human Services (DHHS), and the relevant subagencies and personnel including but not limited to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), the DHHS Secretary, the DHHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the DHHS Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, seeking temporary injunctive relief against any existing or further authorization for use in children under the age of 16, of any of the COVID-19 “vaccines”1 that have been approved under the Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) provided in 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3. In this Motion, Plaintiffs ask only that the status quo be maintained – that the EUAs not permit the use of COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of 16, and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at trial. Such relief would protect the lives and safety of millions of children in the American public for whom serious illness and mortality from COVID-19 represent a zero percent (0%) risk statistically, but who face substantial risks from these experimental injections.

    Motion here.

    #3197
    PS
    Keymaster

    NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they were there to administer at UK School

    Concerned parents have served a notice of liability to two NHS nurses in a school in England in relation to the vaccination of children with the Covid-19 injection.

    The NHS nurses were in the school to give children the experimental Covid-19 injection and were willing to listen and discuss the concerns of the parents, even admitting they have no idea on the long term consequences of administering an experimental injection to children. However, the tune of the nurses soon changed after they were shown evidence the Covid-19 vaccine is harming and killing children and the concerned parents served the nurses with a notice of liability.

    The nurses were informed that “if any harm comes to any child comes to any harm from this facility from a vaccination that has been administered here then you will be held personally liable” as they were served the notice of liability.

    To which one of the NHS nurses took great offence and insisted she would not be held personally liable, before telling the parents that its for their child to decide if they will be having the Covid-19 jab due to the Gillick competent rule, and then telling an outright lie.

    “Can I let you know now that the people who are in hospital with Covid-19 are those that haven’t had the vaccine.” said the defensive NHS nurse.

    To which one of the concerned parents replied “No they’re not that’s an absolute lie.”

    The people serving the papers were of course correct that the NHS nurse was lying to them. The latest data available from the UK Health Security Agency (formerly Public Health England) shows that 60% of those admitted to hospital with Covid-19 over the last four weeks were people who had been vaccinated.

    Link

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Protect Religious Freedom: Stand As Though Your Life Depends on It

Help Covid Care Alliance defend your God-given right to proclaim and live out your faith without fear of government or corporate discrimination!